This month, I attended a NEON/USGS-sponsored workshop in Fort Collins, CO where the goal was to develop a plant phenology ontology. An ontology is a controlled vocabulary (with clear definitions of participants, processes, and the relationships between them) that can be used to link data across networks to facilitate comparisons and analysis. Here is an example of a simple ontology showing components of the vascular leaf:
From the Plant Ontology Consortium |
Plant phenology is the perfect example of a process in need of vocabulary standardization. At the workshop, participants from large-scale ground-based observational networks such as the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) and the National Phenology Network (NPN), as well as participants using remote observations, discussed the different ways we record phenology:
Rob Guralnick leads the charge! Photo by Kjell Bolmgren |
Our phenology terms varied widely depending on the data set! The result is that despite increasing spatial and temporal coverage of phenology observations, the different vocabularies among networks makes the task of comparing or combining these data sets immensely challenging:
Comparing phenology data sets. Photo by Kjell Bolmgren |
Jenn Yost of Cal Poly knocks out an ontology in crayon |
The ultimate goal is to build an ontology that will allow researchers to integrate phenology measurements from different networks, to address important topics like the effects of climate change on phenology in different habitats, or linking species-level and canopy-level phenology. I look forward to continuing work on the plant phenology ontology with this great group of researchers!