By Richard B. Primack
“Regard not your past failures nor
successes. All the past is equally a
failure & a success. It is a success
in as much as it offers you the present opportunity.”
- Henry David Thoreau in
his Journal.
A new study examined the gender and
affiliations of 1051 top-authors, those scientists with the most publications
in 13 leading ecology and conservation journals. Women and the Global South are
barely represented on this list. The overall list of top authors included only
11% women, while 75% of the articles were from authors in just five countries
in the Global North. This massive imbalance in scientific authorship is
extremely concerning, especially in the field of ecology and conservation,
where diverse perspectives are needed to address global climate and
environmental challenges.
Diverse perspectives foster scientific innovation in ecology and conservation (© Bea Maas) |
Analysed trends over different time periods
showed that the proportion of top female authors increased from 3% to 18%
between 1945 and 2019, and authors from the Global South also increased.
The lack of representation of women and the
Global South affects not only top authorship in ecology, but also scientific
leadership.
Global distribution of top authors in ecology and conservation (© Maas et al., 2021, Cons.Lett.) |
The study provides specific recommendations
to promote scientific diversity:
First, scientific journals and societies
should make special efforts to promote diversity and inclusion in leadership
recruitment. Second, the trajectory of a scientific career should be evaluated based
on diverse competencies beyond publication outputs. Third, structural changes
are needed to promote parenting time and diversity among staff, collaborators
and co-authors and protect the integrity of scientific communities.
Publication in "Conservation
Letters": Bea Maas, Robin J Pakeman, Laurent Godet, Linnea Smith,
Vincent Devictor and Richard Primack (2021).
Women and Global South strikingly under-represented among top-publishing
ecologists. Conservation Letters, in press.
No comments:
Post a Comment