Thoreau’s writings
are not “Pond Scum”
Posted by Richard
Primack
In a recent article
in the New Yorker, Kathryn Schulz goes to considerable lengths to argue that Henry David
Thoreau and his book “Walden” are not worthy of their high reputation in American
society. She accuses Thoreau of hypocrisy,
a dislike of people, and being full of contradictions. Schulz’s major
concession to Thoreau is that he is a keen observer of nature.
However, in a rebuttal published in the Boston Globe, we argue that Thoreau’s writings of a century and half ago
have continued relevance to modern society on topics such as greed and
materialism, the value of higher education, and species loss.
We also describe how we have used Thoreau’s
detailed observations from the 1850s of the timing of flowering and leafing out
of plants and the spring arrival of migratory bird species combined with modern
observations to document the impacts of climate change. Plants in Concord are
now flowering and leafing out about 10 days earlier than in Thoreau’s time,
while birds are less responsive to a warming climate. Thoreau’s writings still
inspire new generations of people to observe and protect nature, and have
special value in climate change research.
No comments:
Post a Comment